B/C/J Independent
EVA Air Royal Laurel Class on the 787-9 — A 2026 Review

Airlines

EVA Air Royal Laurel Class on the 787-9 — A 2026 Review

The Vienna leg of any Asia-Europe trip starts with a particular kind of fatigue. Vienna International is small, the long-haul gate cluster is in Terminal 3 on the F pier, and at 11:30 PM local time — when EVA’s BR66 boards for the 11-hour-40-minute eastbound sector to Taipei Taoyuan — the airport is mostly empty. There is one functioning coffee stand in the satellite terminal. The Star Alliance lounge closes at 22:00. The boarding gate has eight rows of chairs and a long, slow queue of passengers wheeling carry-ons that have ridden through too many European city pairs.

This is, paradoxically, one of the better starting points for a long-haul business class review. There are no premium-cabin theatrics at Vienna for an outbound EVA flight. No chauffeur transfer, no Wing-style suite-class arrivals area, no Krug. You walk down the jetbridge in the same line as the economy passengers and you turn left into a 26-seat Royal Laurel cabin that the carrier has been operating, more or less unchanged, for seven years.

What you find when you sit down is one of the most quietly consistent business class products in the Star Alliance — a Thompson Vantage XL platform customised by Designworks (the BMW Group’s design consultancy), wrapped in EVA Air’s specific Royal Laurel finish, and operated on a hard-product configuration that has been refined rather than replaced since the 787-9 entered EVA service in October 2018. I flew BR66 Vienna-Taipei on January 18, 2026 in seat 7A, on aircraft registration B-17888, paying the published one-way revenue fare of EUR 2,840. The return — BR67 Taipei-Vienna on January 30 in seat 5A — was on the same aircraft type, different frame, same product.

This is the long-form 2026 review of the EVA Air Royal Laurel cabin on the 787-9. There is no press trip, no affiliate, and no comp. Both flights were paid in cash.

The Quick Answer

If you are reading this to decide whether to book Royal Laurel on the 787-9 versus the alternatives:

  • For TPE-Vienna and TPE-Munich, this is the only business class option on EVA’s metal, and it is the strongest mid-tier Asia-Europe business class flying in 2026. Book it.
  • For TPE-Brisbane on BR315/BR316, the 787-9 rotates with the 787-10 (which has the slightly denser 32-seat configuration). The 787-9 is the marginally better aircraft for that sector but you cannot reliably select for it; the rotation is fleet-balanced rather than schedule-fixed.
  • For transpacific North American sectors (LAX, SFO, JFK, ORD, SEA, IAH, YVR, YYZ, DFW), EVA does not fly the 787-9. You will get the 777-300ER instead, with the same Vantage XL platform but at a higher cabin density.

The Royal Laurel cabin is not the best business class in the world. ANA The Room is better. Singapore’s new A350-1000 J is better. Qatar Qsuite is better, and the new Cathay Aria is better. The Royal Laurel cabin is the best of what was launched in the 2017-2019 window of staggered non-doored business class — a generation that included the original ANA Staggered, the Singapore 2013-vintage J, and the JAL Sky Suite II. Among that generation, it is the most consistently delivered. That is the genuine value proposition.

Cabin Spec Sheet

The Royal Laurel cabin on the 787-9 is a single cabin of 26 seats, configured 1-2-1 staggered, between rows 2 and 10 (no row 4, in keeping with EVA’s Taiwanese cultural numbering). The seat platform is Thompson Aero’s Vantage XL, the same platform that ships in Lufthansa’s older Allegris business class, the Singapore Airlines 2013 J product, and the Qatar A330 business class. EVA’s specific customisation is by Designworks — BMW Group’s design consultancy — and uses a beige-and-cream colour palette with leather-wrapped console surfaces and brushed-metal accents.

The published and measured specifications are:

SpecificationRoyal Laurel (BR 787-9)
Layout1-2-1 staggered
Seat width at shoulder26 in (66 cm)
Seat width at armrest21 in (53 cm)
Bed length76 in (193 cm)
Pitch44 in (112 cm)
Privacy doorNo
Privacy partition (centre pair)Yes, movable
IFE display18 in HD touchscreen
PowerAC universal, USB-A x2, USB-C 60W (added 2022 retrofit)
Wireless chargingNo
Bluetooth audioNo (wired Phitek-supplied headphones)
Suites per cabin26
BeddingBamford Grooming Department amenity kit (Ferragamo on outbound from Asia)
Catering kitchenDo & Co (Vienna), LSG (Munich), EVA TPE in-house (Asia)

The 26-suite count is the meaningful number. EVA’s 777-300ER carries 38 Royal Laurel seats in two cabins; the 787-9’s 26 in a single cabin produces a noticeably calmer cabin environment, particularly during meal service. The flight attendant-to-passenger ratio in Royal Laurel is approximately 1:9 on a 787-9 sector versus 1:13 on a 777-300ER, and the difference is visible in service responsiveness on the medium-load flights.

The 76-inch bed length is the spec that disappoints. Tall passengers (over 188 cm) will run out of footwell on the diagonal Vantage XL geometry — the foot end of the bed angles into a cubby beneath the seat in front, and the cubby is sized for 76 inches of stretch, not 80. The shoulder width at 26 inches is generous for the segment, and the armrest-line width at 21 inches is class-competitive.

The lack of a privacy door is the headline missing feature. The Vantage XL platform was designed before the closing-door era of business class became standard, and EVA has not retrofitted doors onto its existing 787-9 fleet. The 2022 retrofit programme added USB-C 60W charging and refreshed the cabin upholstery; it did not add doors. EVA’s product team has confirmed that the next-generation Royal Laurel — scheduled to debut on the 777-9 deliveries from 2027 — will include a doored configuration, but the existing 787-9 fleet will not be retrofitted before its 2030s mid-life refresh.

Seat-by-Seat Walkthrough

The staggered geometry means that not all seats are equal. There are essentially four seat archetypes on the 787-9 Royal Laurel cabin, and the choice matters meaningfully for sleep quality and privacy.

The true window seats: 2A, 2K, 5A, 5K, 7A, 7K, 9A, 9K

These are the seats where the seat itself sits closer to the window and the console runs between the seat and the aisle. This is the more enclosed configuration — your back is to the cabin and the console acts as a visual barrier. On a redeye sector like BR66 (Vienna 23:30 departure), this is the configuration you want for sleep.

I sat in 7A on the outbound and 5A on the return. Both produced the same essential experience: a slightly burrowed-in feel, with the aisle activity buffered by the side console. The window at row 7 on the 787-9 is the third window from the bulkhead in the Royal Laurel cabin, and the 787’s electrochromic dimming windows are managed at the cabin level (the crew has a master override); individual passenger control is via the small button on the windowsill but is overridden when the master setting is engaged. The crew dimmed all windows about 90 minutes into the cruise on the eastbound sector and did not re-illuminate until 90 minutes before arrival.

The non-true window seats: 3A, 3K, 6A, 6K, 8A, 8K, 10A, 10K

These rows have the seat closer to the aisle and the console between the seat and the window. The configuration is better for stretching out laterally — there is more usable lateral space when the seat is in the upright dining position — but it exposes you to the aisle. Without a privacy door, this is the more exposed configuration during meal service and during cabin walkthroughs. For passengers planning to work for most of the flight and sleep only a short period, the non-true-window rows are marginally more comfortable to actually inhabit. For passengers planning to sleep the majority of the flight, avoid these rows.

The centre pairs

The centre seats (D and G) alternate between close-together “honeymoon” configurations (in rows 2, 5, 7, 9 — the same row numbers as the true window seats) and divided-pair configurations (in rows 3, 6, 8, 10). The close-together pairs have a movable centre divider that can be retracted to shoulder height for couples travelling together; the divided pairs have a fixed shoulder-height console between them.

For solo travellers booking a centre seat by necessity (because window selection has been blocked), prefer the divided-pair rows. For couples, the close-together rows are clearly the better booking and on EVA they are available for free selection — there is no surcharge for the honeymoon pair, unlike some competitors who have monetised the configuration.

The bulkhead pair: 2D, 2G

The forward centre pair sits against the bulkhead with the closet wall behind them. These are the quietest seats in the cabin because the bulkhead absorbs galley noise from the forward galley. They are the seats I would book for an overnight sector with a partner. The downside is that the bulkhead position means you cannot stow items in the under-seat ottoman during taxi and takeoff; the bulkhead position requires all carry-on to go in the overhead bins until cruise.

Bedding and Sleep Quality

The bedding programme on EVA’s 787-9 is the segment-standard package: a 3 cm memory-foam mattress pad, a single duvet, two pillows (one firm, one soft), and a single set of pyjamas in dark blue with white piping. The pyjamas are EVA-branded (not a luxury house collaboration), and they fit roughly in the 2017-vintage style — relaxed two-piece, soft cotton-poly blend, not the heavier brushed fabric that has become the segment standard since the Bamford collaborations of 2021 onward.

The mattress pad is thinner than what Cathay (Bamford-supplied) or ANA (Frette-supplied) fits, but the underlying Vantage XL bed surface is firm enough that the thinner pad is not actively detrimental. The duvet is appropriately weighted at approximately 220 GSM. The pillows are average. The cabin temperature on both my flights was maintained at approximately 21 degrees Celsius, which is the segment standard and well-controlled by the 787-9’s auto-cabin-management.

I slept approximately seven hours on the eastbound (Vienna-Taipei) sector and four hours on the westbound (Taipei-Vienna). The eastbound performance is better than most competitor products in the Vantage XL generation — the cabin was quiet, the lighting was well-managed, and the 26-seat cabin density meant there was no service activity during the cruise sleep window after the first meal service concluded. The westbound is harder for a structural reason: the Taipei evening departure is a body-clock daytime flight for European-bound passengers, and no business class product solves that problem.

Catering: The Din Tai Fung Programme and the Western Menu

EVA Air’s catering on long-haul Royal Laurel is structured around a two-fork menu — a Chinese-Taiwanese menu and a Western menu — with pre-order availability via the EVA Air mobile app from 14 days to 24 hours before departure. The standout dish on the Chinese menu is the Din Tai Fung-collaborated xiao long bao service, introduced as a permanent menu item in 2023 and rotating quarterly between three preparations (the classic pork, the truffle pork, and a seasonal vegetable variant).

The Din Tai Fung collaboration is more substantive than it might sound. The xiao long bao are prepared in EVA’s TPE catering kitchen by chefs trained at Din Tai Fung’s Xinyi flagship in Taipei, and they ship out to outstations (including Vienna and Munich) frozen but vacuum-sealed in single-portion steamer baskets. The reheating protocol on the aircraft uses the steam ovens in the forward galley, and the resulting dumplings are noticeably better than the standard catering xiao long bao that other Asia-based carriers serve. The skin is thin enough that the broth inside remains intact, which is the canonical Din Tai Fung quality marker.

On BR66 (Vienna-Taipei) the catering was sourced from Do & Co Vienna, the same kitchen that caters Austrian Airlines’ premium cabins. The Western menu featured a veal schnitzel that was structurally compromised by the reheating process (predictable), and a smoked salmon appetiser that was excellent. The Chinese menu’s headline course was a braised beef cheek over jasmine rice that was the standout dish of the meal service.

On BR67 (Taipei-Vienna) the catering was from EVA’s own TPE kitchen — the in-house catering operation that supplies all TPE-originating long-hauls. The quality differential was meaningful. The Chinese tasting menu (a five-course progression including a steamed grouper, a black truffle and chicken consomme, and the xiao long bao service) was the strongest single business class meal I have eaten in 2026. The Western menu was a fillet mignon that was edible but unremarkable.

The wine list is a meaningful strength of the EVA programme. The Champagne pour is Charles Heidsieck Brut Reserve (mid-tier for the segment but a good choice — Heidsieck is more flavourful than the Taittinger most competitors pour). The white wine selection includes a 2022 Domaine Laroche Chablis 1er Cru Les Vaudevey that is a genuinely strong by-the-glass pour. The red selection includes a Bordeaux from Chateau Cantemerle that is a 5eme grand cru classe (5th-growth) and an unusually good selection for the price point.

The amenity kit on the eastbound rotation was a Bamford Grooming Department kit in a soft-shell pouch with shave gel, balm, lip balm, and toothbrush. On the westbound (TPE-originating), the kit rotated to a Salvatore Ferragamo hard-shell case with the Ferragamo Signorina amenities — a kit that EVA introduced in late 2019 and continues to rotate quarterly with three colourway variants. The Ferragamo kit is one of the better amenity kits in business class in 2026, comparable to the Le Labo kits that Singapore Airlines fits.

In-Flight Entertainment, Connectivity, and Power

The IFE system on the 787-9 is a Panasonic eX3 platform delivering content through an 18-inch HD touchscreen. The screen size is below the segment standard (the new generation runs 23-24 inches), but the content library is competitive — approximately 250 movies, 300 TV episodes, a substantive library of Mandarin-language content, and a meaningful selection of Japanese, Korean, and Thai films that reflect EVA’s Asia network.

The Bluetooth audio pairing is not available. The supplied headphones are Phitek-branded noise-cancelling cans that are competent but a step below the Sony WH-1000XM4 or Bose QC equivalents that competitor carriers fit. If you bring your own Bluetooth headphones, you will need to bring an adapter; EVA does not supply one in Royal Laurel.

Connectivity is via Panasonic eXConnect Ku-band, and the throughput on both my flights was approximately 5-8 Mbps — adequate for video calls, comfortable for email and messaging, and slower than the Viasat-equipped North American carriers. The business class connectivity package was complimentary on both flights (a benefit EVA introduced in 2024 for Royal Laurel passengers on long-haul sectors over six hours).

Power: one universal AC outlet (110V, 100W), two USB-A ports, and one USB-C 60W port (the USB-C was added in the 2022 retrofit). No wireless charging. The 60W USB-C is adequate for tablets and phones but underpowered for a 16-inch laptop; a working professional flying a long-haul sector should plan on the AC outlet for laptop charging.

The Star Alliance Connection Question

EVA’s Star Alliance positioning is a meaningful part of the value proposition for North American flyers. TPE is a credible Star Alliance hub for Asia-Pacific connectivity — Singapore Airlines connects through (separately) and the United/Air Canada/ANA network can be patched together with EVA into a single-alliance trip — and the EVA business class lounge at TPE Terminal 2 (The Star) is the strongest Star Alliance lounge in the carrier’s Pacific network, comparable to the United Polaris Lounges at SFO and LAX but with significantly better food service.

Award redemption via Aeroplan (Air Canada) costs 75,000 Aeroplan points one-way for Asia-North America in Royal Laurel, which is among the strongest Star Alliance award rates flying in 2026. United MileagePlus charges 88,000 miles one-way for the same redemption. ANA Mileage Club charges 75,000 round-trip from Japan to North America via TPE on a connecting itinerary, which remains the strongest absolute value for the redemption.

The lounge access at outstation airports is the practical Star Alliance benefit. Out of Vienna, EVA business class passengers access the Austrian Airlines Senator Lounge in Terminal 3 (the Star Alliance-shared lounge for outbound long-hauls); the lounge is competent but not exceptional. Out of Munich, the Lufthansa Senator Lounge in Terminal 2 is significantly stronger — better food, better seating density, and a longer operating window.

The Service Question

The service training programme at EVA’s Taoyuan academy is the institutional foundation for what is consistently the strongest in-flight service of any Star Alliance carrier in 2026. The flight attendant academy curriculum runs six months for new hires, includes mandatory rotations through the catering kitchen and the lounge operations, and emphasises a specific hospitality framing that EVA calls “the home-on-board” — a service philosophy that produces unusually relaxed, attentive, and consistently friendly cabin service.

On BR66 (Vienna-Taipei), the senior flight attendant in Royal Laurel was on her fourth year with the airline and managed the 26-seat cabin with two junior colleagues. The meal service ran 75 minutes from drink trolley to dessert plate clearance, which is at the fast end for business class. The pre-arrival breakfast service was offered as an opt-in (a feature that is increasingly standard but not universal in the segment), and the offered choice included the xiao long bao service for breakfast — an unusual and welcome option.

On BR67 (Taipei-Vienna), the cabin was managed by a more senior crew, and the service quality was meaningfully higher — closer to the Singapore Airlines benchmark than to the mid-tier Star Alliance standard. The dessert course included a chef-collaborated Taiwanese pineapple cake served warm, which is the kind of catering detail that does not appear on the published menu and that distinguishes the EVA programme.

The Verdict

The EVA Air Royal Laurel cabin on the 787-9 is the strongest hard-product execution of the Thompson Vantage XL platform in the Star Alliance, and the catering and service make it punch significantly above the spec sheet. It is not the best business class flying in 2026 — the absence of a privacy door is a meaningful regression versus the doored products that have defined the post-2022 segment — but it is the best business class for the routes EVA actually flies, and it is among the strongest business class products available through Star Alliance award redemption.

For TPE-Vienna and TPE-Munich, this is the only Royal Laurel option and it is well worth booking. For transpacific North American sectors, you will be on the 777-300ER and not the 787-9; the underlying seat is the same but the cabin density is higher. For TPE-Brisbane, the 787-9 rotates with the 787-10 and both are credible options.

The next-generation Royal Laurel, scheduled for the 777-9 deliveries from 2027, will be a doored product with a closing privacy door, an updated IFE platform, and a refreshed catering programme. Until then, the existing 787-9 Royal Laurel is the EVA product to know, and it remains a genuinely strong value in a business class market where the price-to-quality ratio has compressed sharply since 2022.

Related on the journal. Air Canada Signature Class on the 787-9 — A 2026 Review · Copa Airlines Business Class on the 737 MAX 8 and MAX 9 — A 2026 Review · Air New Zealand Business Premier Luxe on the 787-9 — A 2026 Review · SWISS Senses Business Class on the A350-900 — A 2026 Review

Frequently Asked Questions

Does EVA Air operate the 787-9 to Los Angeles or San Francisco in 2026? No — and this catches a lot of US-based EVA flyers out. The transpacific North American gateways from Taipei (LAX, SFO, JFK, ORD, SEA, IAH, YVR, YYZ, and the new DFW service launched October 2025) are flown by EVA’s 777-300ER fleet, not the 787-9. The 787-9 is deployed on EVA’s mid-haul Asia network and on the European long-hauls to Vienna (BR66/BR67) and Munich (BR71/BR72), plus Brisbane (BR315/BR316) where the 787-9 and 787-10 are rotated. If you want the Royal Laurel suite on a 1-2-1 staggered hard product out of North America, you have to either connect via Asia onto a 787-9 sector, or fly the 777-300ER, which has the same Thompson Vantage XL platform but at a different cabin density.

Which Royal Laurel seats are the best on the 787-9? On the BR-livery 787-9 in the 26-seat 1-2-1 staggered configuration, the true window seats — rows 2, 5, 7, and 9 in the A and K columns — are the strongest. These are the rows where the seat sits closer to the window and the side console runs between you and the aisle. For couples, the centre pairs in rows 2, 5, 7, and 9 are the close-together configuration; rows 3, 6, 8, 10 are the divided-pair rows. There is no row 4 on EVA — a Taiwanese cultural numbering preference shared with several Asian carriers.

Is the Hello Kitty Royal Laurel cabin the same product as the standard 787-9? Not on the 787-9 — none of EVA’s currently-flying Hello Kitty liveries are 787-9s. The Hello Kitty fleet in 2026 consists of two A330-300s, the Celebration Flight A330-300, and the Besties Jet 777-300ER. The Hello Kitty routes in 2026 cover TPE to Bali, Clark, Chicago, and Cebu — none of which are 787-9 routes. If you want the Hello Kitty cabin experience with Royal Laurel, the ORD-TPE Besties Jet 777-300ER is the only North American option, and it is a fleet-specific operation that can rotate off if there is an aircraft swap.

How does the Thompson Vantage XL on EVA compare to other 787 business class products? EVA’s Vantage XL is the staggered-but-not-suite variant of the platform with EVA’s specific Designworks (BMW Group) customisation. It is behind newer doored products like Qsuite, Aria, ANA The Room, or the new Singapore A350-1000 J on hard-product privacy, but it sits ahead of older reverse-herringbone Cirrus products and ahead of every 2-2-2 still flying. The 76-inch bed length is industry-average, the 44-inch pitch is slightly above average, and the lack of a privacy door is the headline missing feature.

Is EVA Royal Laurel a credible alternative to ANA or Singapore for transpacific premium cabin travel? Yes for the routes EVA actually flies, with one caveat. The catering programme, the service training, and the Star Alliance hub at TPE Terminal 2 all support a strong value proposition. The caveat is hard product: until EVA fits a doored business class — which the carrier has confirmed for the 777-9 deliveries starting 2027 but not before — the cabin will trail Singapore, ANA The Room, and the new Cathay Aria on pure seat dimensions and privacy. For award redemption value via Aeroplan, United MileagePlus, or ANA Mileage Club, EVA Royal Laurel remains one of the strongest Asia-based options in 2026.

Frequently asked questions

Does EVA Air operate the 787-9 to Los Angeles or San Francisco in 2026?
No — and this catches a lot of US-based EVA flyers out. The transpacific North American gateways from Taipei (LAX, SFO, JFK, ORD, SEA, IAH, YVR, YYZ, and the new DFW service launched October 2025) are flown by EVA's 777-300ER fleet, not the 787-9. The 787-9 is deployed on EVA's mid-haul Asia network and on the European long-hauls to Vienna (BR66/BR67) and Munich (BR71/BR72), plus Brisbane (BR315/BR316) where the 787-9 and 787-10 are rotated. If you want the Royal Laurel suite on a 1-2-1 staggered hard product out of North America, you have to either connect via Asia onto a 787-9 sector, or fly the 777-300ER, which has the same Thompson Vantage XL platform but at a different cabin density (38 versus 26 Royal Laurel seats).
Which Royal Laurel seats are the best on the 787-9?
On the BR-livery 787-9 in the 26-seat 1-2-1 staggered configuration, the true window seats — rows 2, 5, 7, and 9 in the A and K columns — are the strongest. These are the rows where the seat sits closer to the window and the side console runs between you and the aisle, which produces the most enclosed feel in a staggered cabin that does not actually have suite doors. The non-true window seats in rows 3, 6, 8, and 10 sit closer to the aisle, with the console between you and the window — better for stretching out but exposed to the aisle. For couples, the centre pairs in rows 2, 5, 7, and 9 are the close-together configuration; rows 3, 6, 8, 10 are the divided-pair rows. There is no row 4 on EVA — a Taiwanese cultural numbering preference shared with several Asian carriers.
Is the Hello Kitty Royal Laurel cabin the same product as the standard 787-9?
Not on the 787-9 — none of EVA's currently-flying Hello Kitty liveries are 787-9s. The Hello Kitty fleet in 2026 consists of two A330-300s (Joyful Dream and BAD BADTZ-MARU Travel Fun), the Celebration Flight A330-300, and the Besties Jet 777-300ER. The Hello Kitty routes in 2026 cover TPE to Bali, Clark, Chicago, and Cebu — none of which are 787-9 routes. EVA has confirmed no plan to apply Hello Kitty livery to the 787-9 fleet through at least 2027. If you want the Hello Kitty cabin experience with Royal Laurel, the ORD-TPE Besties Jet 777-300ER is the only North American option, and it is a fleet-specific operation that can rotate off if there is an aircraft swap.
How does the Thompson Vantage XL on EVA compare to other 787 business class products?
EVA's Vantage XL is the staggered-but-not-suite variant of the platform — same family as ANA's older Staggered cabin and the Singapore Airlines 2013-generation J — but with EVA's specific Designworks (BMW Group) customisation. It is meaningfully behind newer doored products like Qsuite, Aria, ANA The Room, or the new Singapore A350-1000 business class on hard-product privacy, but it sits comfortably ahead of older reverse-herringbone Cirrus products and ahead of every 2-2-2 still flying. The 76-inch bed length is industry-average, the 44-inch pitch is slightly above average, and the lack of a privacy door is the headline missing feature. EVA's competitive answer is the service, the catering, and the Royal Laurel hard-product consistency across both 787-9 and 777-300ER fleets — a passenger flying TPE-VIE and connecting onto BR15 TPE-SFO gets the same fundamental seat experience on both legs, which is unusually consistent for the segment.
Is EVA Royal Laurel a credible alternative to ANA or Singapore for transpacific premium cabin travel?
Yes for the routes EVA actually flies, with one caveat. The catering programme — particularly the Din Tai Fung-collaborated xiao long bao service introduced on long-hauls in 2023, and the rotating chef tasting menu out of TPE — sits comfortably in the top quartile of Asia-based business class catering. The service training (EVA's flight attendant academy in Taoyuan runs a six-month curriculum that is unusually rigorous for a Star Alliance mid-tier carrier) produces a meaningful in-flight service quality. The Star Alliance hub at TPE Terminal 2 connects efficiently to onward Star Alliance flights across Asia-Pacific. The caveat is hard product: until EVA fits a doored business class — which the carrier has confirmed for the 777-9 deliveries starting 2027 but not before — the cabin will trail Singapore, ANA The Room, and the new Cathay Aria on pure seat dimensions and privacy. For award redemption value via Aeroplan, United MileagePlus, or ANA Mileage Club, EVA Royal Laurel remains one of the strongest Asia-based options in 2026.
Share / save